Collective activity which consists in analyzing and writing a group report on a case study, based on the course contents. Guidelines are available in the virtual course.
Qualification and evaluation criteria
Qualification and evaluation criteria
Evaluation Criteria
The following general criteria will be taken into account in the evaluation:
Collaborative interaction among the subgroup members
Responses in accordance to course contents
Adequate structure and length
Conceptual rigour and precise use of the specific terminology in the course
Real or simulated application of the contents in the intervention design
Degree of personal elaboration and originality
Use of proper arguments to defend theses
Analysis of implications and critical reflection
Diversity, quality and currency of resources used
Quotes of authors throughout the texts and proper references of all the sources used (basic, complementary and others), using the APA style (7th edition)
Proper formal presentation, in accordance with the requirements of the activity
Ponderación de la PEC en la nota final
Ponderación de la PEC en la nota final
50%
Approximate submission date
Approximate submission date
January, 2024; September, 2024
Comments
Comments
ATTENTION
VERY IMPORTANT: If there are traces of plagiarism in any of the assignments, the student will not pass the subject in February, and the activity must be re-elaborated and delivered in September. If plagiarism is detected in September, the student will fail the course.
OTHER GRADEABLE ACTIVITIESS
Is there another activity / s that can be evaluated?
Is there another activity / s that can be evaluated?
Si
Description
Description
* PEC 2 - Online test
Individual activity based on the course contents. Response to a questionnaire in the virtual platform, with a limited time span. It will be available for a whole day. The fixed date will be announced in the platform. It will not coincide with exam weeks.
Qualification and evaluation criteria
Qualification and evaluation criteria
Evaluation Criteria
The following general criteria will be taken into account in the evaluation:
Collaborative interaction among the subgroup members
Responses in accordance to course contents
Adequate structure and length
Conceptual rigour and precise use of the specific terminology in the course
Real or simulated application of the contents in the intervention design
Degree of personal elaboration and originality
Use of proper arguments to defend theses
Analysis of implications and critical reflection
Diversity, quality and currency of resources used
Quotes of authors throughout the texts and proper references of all the sources used (basic, complementary and others), using the APA style (7th edition)
Proper formal presentation, in accordance with the requirements of the activity
Ponderación en la nota final
Ponderación en la nota final
50 %
Approximate submission date
Approximate submission date
Frebuary, 2024; September, 2024
Comments
Comments
ATTENTION
VERY IMPORTANT: If there are traces of plagiarism in any of the assignments, the student will not pass the subject in February, and the activity must be re-elaborated and delivered in September. If plagiarism is detected in September, the student will fail the course.
How to obtain the final grade?
50 % (PEC1) + 50 % (PEC2)
A minimum of 5 points in each PEC is required to pass the subject. It is possible to deliver them either in the ordinary term (February), or in the extraordinary term (September). You can deliver both PEC in the same term, or one in each (the grades are maintained throughout the whole academic year).