Accesos directos a las distintas zonas del curso

Ir a los contenidos

Ir a menú navegación principal

Ir a menú pie de página

TEMAS DE PRAGMÁTICA, ARGUMENTACIÓN Y ACTOS DE HABLA

Curso 2022/2023/Subject's code3001002-

TEMAS DE PRAGMÁTICA, ARGUMENTACIÓN Y ACTOS DE HABLA

BIBLIOGRAFÍA BÁSICA


  • Austin, John L. 1962. How to Do Things with Words. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
  • Bermejo-Luque, Lilian. 2011. Giving reasons: A linguistic-pragmatic approach to argumentation theory. Dordrecht: Springer.
  • Corredor, Cristina. 2020. Speaking, inferring, arguing: On the argumentative character of speech. Studia Semiotyczne 34(2): 43-64. Available online: http://studiasemiotyczne.pts.edu.pl/index.php/Studiasemiotyczne/article/view/214 (accessed on 13 May 2022)
  • Corredor, Cristina. 2020a. Deliberative speech acts: An interactional approach. Language & Communication 71: 136-148.
  • Corredor, Cristina 2020b. Democratic legitimacy and acts of dissent. In: Catarina Dutilh Novaes, Henrike Jansen, Jan Albert van Laar, Bart Verheij (Eds.), Reason to Dissent: Proceedings of the European Conference on Argumentation 2019, Volume I, pp. 159-176. College Publications. Available online: https://www.collegepublications.co.uk/logic/sla/?00012 (accessed on 13 May 2022)
  • Eemeren, Frans.H. van, and Robert Grootendorst. 1989. Speech act conditions as tools for reconstructing argumentative discourse. Argumentation 3: 367–383.
  • Eemeren, Frans H. van, and Robert Grootendorst. 2004. A systematic theory of argumentation: The pragma-dialectical approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Grice, Paul H. 1989. Studies in the Way of Words. Harvard University Press.
  • Hitchcock, David, Peter McBurney and Simons Parsons. 2001. A framework for deliberation dialogues. OSSA Conference Archive 57. Available online: https://scholar.uwindsor.ca/ossaarchive/OSSA4/papersandcommentaries/57/ (accessed on 13 May 2022)
  • Jacobs, S. Scott. 1989. Speech acts and argument. Argumentation 3: 345–65.
  • Kauffeld, Fred J. 1999. Arguments on the dialectical tier as structured by proposing and advising. In: Christopher W. Tindale et al. (Eds.), Argumentation at the Century’s Turn: Proceedings of the Third OSSA Conference. St. Catharines: OSSA. Available online: https://scholar.uwindsor.ca/ossaarchive/OSSA3/papersandcommentaries/32/ (accessed on 23 March 2022).
  • Kauffeld, Fred J., and Beth Innocenti. 2018. A normative pragmatic theory of exhorting. Argumentation 32: 463–83.
  • Kauffeld, Fred J., and Jean Goodwin. 2022. Two views of speech acts: Analysis and implications for argumentation theory. Languages 7(93): 1-14. Available online: https://doi.org/10.3390/languages7020093 (accessed on 13 May 2022)
  • Lavinaz, Paolo and Marina Sbisà. 2018. Argumentation as a dimension of discourse. Pragmatics & Cognition 25(3): 602-630.
  • Lewinski, Marcin. 2021. Speech act pluralism in argumentative polylogues. Informal Logic 41(3): 421–451. Available online: https://informallogic.ca/index.php/informal_logic/article/view/6855 (accessed on 13 May 2022)
  • Lewinski, Marcin and Mark Aakhus. 2014. Argumentative polylogues in a dialectical framework: A methodological inquiry. Argumentation 28(2): 161-185.
  • Macagno, Frabrizio and Douglas Walton. 2013. Implicatures as Forms of Argument. In Alessandro Capone et al. (Eds.), Perspectives on Pragmatics and Philosophy, pp. 203–225. Springer International Publishing. Available online: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-01011-3_9 (accessed 13 May 2022)
  • Sbisà, Marina. 2006. Two conceptions of rationality in Grice’s theory of implicature. In Elvio Baccarini et al. (Eds.), Rationality of Belief and Action, pp. 233–247, Rijeka: University of Rijeka.
  •  
MATRICÚLATE
MATRÍCULA ABIERTA grado,máster, selectividad y más
OFERTA COMPLETA DE ESTUDIOS