LAUNIVERSIDAD » Facultades y Escuelas » Facultad de Filosofía » Docencia » Directorio Docente » David Teira Serrano » David Teira Research papers
David Teira Research papers

 

Research | Investigación

|Click on the title to download the preprint|

{Clinical trials + Field trials}

D. Teira, "Placebo trials without mechanisms: How far can they go?", Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences (2019)

M. Andreoletti & D. Teira, “Rules versus standards: what are the costs of epistemic norms in drug regulation?”, Science, Technology and Human Values (2019)

N. Tempini & D. Teira, “Is the genie out of the bottle? Digital platforms and the future of clinical trials”, Economy and Society, 48:1 (2019) 77-106 [Also: “Patients’ online interventions can scupper clinical trials” [Correspondence], Nature 565, 429 (2019)]

M. Andreoletti & D. Teira, “Statistical evidence and the reliability of medical research”. In H. Kincaid, J. Simon & M. Solomon, The Routledge Handbook of Philosophy of Medicine, London, Routledge, 2017, 218-227

“Testing oncological treatments in the era of personalized medicine”, in G. Boniolo & M. Nathan, eds., Philosophy of Molecular Medicine, Routledge, 2017, 236-251

“Debiasing methods and the acceptability of experimental outcomes”, Foundations of science 24.6 (2016), 722-743.

M. González-Moreno, C. Saborido & D. Teira, "Disease-mongering through Clinical Trials", Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, 51 (2015), 11-18

A. Diaz, M. Jiménez-Buedo & D. Teira, "Quasi- and Field experiments", James D. Wright (editor-in-chief), International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences, 2nd edition, Vol 19. Oxford: Elsevier, 2015, pp. 736–741.

"On the impartiality of British trials", Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, 44.3 (2013), 412-418.

“A contractarian solution to the experimenter’s regress”, Philosophy of science 80 (2013), 709-720

"Blinding and the non-interference assumption in field experiments", Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 43.3 (2013), 358-372.

D. Teira & Julian Reiss, “Causality, Impartiality and Evidence-Based Policy”, in H-K Chao, S-T, Chen & R. Millstein, Mechanism and causality in biology and economics, Springer, 2013, 207-224

"Frequentist versus Bayesian Clinical Trials", in Fred Gifford, ed., Philosophy of Medicine [Handbook of Philosophy of Science, vol. 16], Amsterdam, Elsevier, 2010, pp. 255-297

 

{Positivism and prediction, Friedman's methodology}

Hsiang-Ke Chao & D. Teira, “Model-Based Knowledge and Credible Policy Analysis”,in Hsiang-Ke Chao & Julian Reiss (eds.), Philosophy of Science in Practice. Nancy Cartwright and the Nature of Scientific Reasoning, Springer (Synthese Library), 2017, 181-197.

"The Politics of Positivism: Disinterested Predictions from interested agents", in U. Mäki, ed., The Methodology of Positive Economics: reflections on the Milton Friedman legacy, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2009, pp. 189-214 (with J. Zamora Bonilla).

"Why Friedman's methodology did not generate consensus among economists?", Journal of the History of Economic Thought, 31.2 (2009), 201-214.

Editor, Review Symposium: J. Reiss, Error in economics, Economics and philosophy, 25.2 (2009), 199-215

"Milton Friedman, the Statistical Methodologist", History of Political Economy 39.3 (2007), 511-528

"A Positivist Tradition in Early Demand Theory", Journal of Economic Methodology 13.1 (2006), pp. 25-47.

"Frank Knight: Le risque comme critique de l'économie politique", Revue de Synthèse 121.4 (2000), pp. 79-116.

 

{Facts and values in expected utility theory}

A. Heras, P.-Ch. Pradier, D. Teira “What was fair in actuarial fairness?”, History of the Human Sciences, 2019

S. Jallais, P-Ch Pradier & D. Teira, "Facts, Norms and Expected Utility Functions", History of the Human Sciences 21.2 (2008), 45-62

"On the Normative Dimension of St. Petersburg Paradox", Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 37 (2006), pp. 210-23

"The Theology of Large Numbers: a Conjecture", Journ@l Electronique d'Histoire des Probabilités et de la Statistique 2/1 (2006)

Jan Sprenger & David Teira, “The Ethics of Statistical Testing”, in C. Luetge, ed., Handbook of Business Ethics, Springer, 2013, pp. 1535-1549.

 

Social Epistemology | Philosophy of the Social Sciences

D. Teira &, J. Zamora, eds, "Science, normativity and the public", Social epistemology, 21.1 (2007), pp. 1-81

J. Reiss, D. Teira, J. Zamora, eds., "New Philosophy of the social sciences", Philosophy of the social sciences, 38.3 (2008), 311-78

"Continental Philosophies of the Social Sciences", I. Jarvie & J. Zamora (eds.), The Sage Handbook of the Philosophy of the Social Science, London, Sage, 2011

With J. González de Prado “Choosing expert statistical advice: practical costs and epistemic justification”, Episteme 12.1 (2015), 117-129

With J. M. Suay "Kites: the rise and fall of a scientific object", Nuncius. Journal of the Material and Visual History of Science, 29.2 (2014), 439-463

 

 

Filosofía de la economía

"Probabilidad y contratos. Sobre el pragmatismo de Roberto Torretti", Revista de Humanidades de Valparaíso, 8 (2016), 251-268

Con A. Heras, "Cómo mide el riesgo el observador imparcial", Crítica, 47 (2015), 47-65

«Popper, Friedman y la ingeniería social, cincuenta años después», en Ana Rosa Pérez Ransanz y Ambrosio Velasco Gómez, eds., Racionalidad en ciencia y tecnología, UNAM, 2011, 359-364

«Los economistas como metodólogos: Friedman y Samuelson», en Juan Carlos García-Bermejo (ed.), Sobre la economía y sus métodos[Enciclopedia Iberoamericana de Filosofía, vol, 30], Madrid, Trotta-CSIC, 2009, pp. 21-34.

(Co-ed.) Sección monográfica: “Filosofía Iberoamericana de la Economía”, Éndoxa: Series filosóficas nº 21, 2006, pp. 293-394

«Henry Ludwell Moore y la introducción del positivismo estadístico en economía», en G. Marqués et al., eds., Objetividad, realismo y retórica. Nuevas perspectivas en metodología de la economía, Madrid: FCE, 2003, pp. 167-198. (Con A. Fernández)

Azar, economía y política en Milton Friedman (Biblioteca Virtual Miguel de Cervantes, 2005)

«¿Ética o economía? Philippe van Parijs y la renta básica», Isegoría 29 (2003), pp. 159-172.

«Frank Knight y los positivistas», en Wenceslao González et al., eds., Enfoques filosófico-metodológicos en economía, Madrid: FCE, 2002, pp. 107-141. (Con P-Ch. Pradier)

«Lo uno y lo múltiple. La estructura de la explicación económica en Walras y Marshall», en Alfonso Ávila et al., eds., Ciencia económica y Economía de la Ciencia, Madrid: FCE, 2001, pp. 240-267

 

Filosofía de la medicina

"Normas éticas y estadísticas en la justificación de los ensayos clínicos aleatorizados", Crítica. Revista Hispanoamericana de Filosofía38 (2006), 39-60 (Con M. García Alonso)

"Ensayos clinicos e interés general", Arbor, CLXXXIV 730 (2008), 207-216

 

Filosofía de las ciencias sociales | Epistemología social

"Por una filosofía social de la ciencia", Teorema 25/3 (2006), pp. 141-153.