INTERNAL SYSTEM TO GUARANTEE THE QUALITY OF THE DEGREE

The UNED has an Internal System of Quality Control (SGIC-U in Spanish) that covers all the official Bachelor’s, Master’s and Doctorate degree titles, as well as the services offered, the design of which has been certified by the ANECA – National Agency for the Evaluation and Accreditation of Quality).

The SGIC-U contemplates all the processes necessary to ensure the quality of the professors, the resources and of the services offered to the students: access, admission and reception, external practical experience, mobility programmes, academic orientation and incorporation into the workplace, follow-up and evaluation of the training results, the attention to suggestions and reclamations, and adaptation of support personal, among others.

The people responsible for the SGIC are:

• The UNED’s Quality Control Commission
• The Centre’s Quality Control Commission
• The Dean’s office or the Management Team
• The Commission Coordinating the Degree Title (approved by the Faculty board, 9^th July 2008)

The Commission coordinating the Degree Title:

The mission of the Commission coordinating the Degree Title is to supervise the implementation and development of the degree course’s study plan with a view to guarantee its accreditation, as approved by the Governing Council, 8^th Abril 2008, BICI No. 22, ANNEX II of 26th March 2009).

The composition of the Commission based on the document approved by the Governing Council, 8^th Abril 2008:

• President: Dean or a person delegated by them.
• Vice-president: Coordinator of the course.
• Person Responsible for Quality Control at the Centre.
• A professor from each Department that contributes teaching duties and obligatory material to the degree course.
• A student representative.
• A representative of the professors/tutors.
• The Head of the Student Services Section.

Coordinator of the Degree Course: Isabel Gómez Veiga

Through the Statistical portal, the UNED provides information to the entire university community regarding both the results of the training/teaching, as well as the degree of satisfaction of the distinct collectives implicated.