Accesos directos a las distintas zonas del curso

Ir a los contenidos

Ir a menú navegación principal

Ir a menú pie de página

TFM - PROCESO TERAPÉUTICO

Curso 2016/2017 / Cod.22200267

TFM - PROCESO TERAPÉUTICO

BIBLIOGRAFÍA COMPLEMENTARIA


Comentarios y anexos:

Botella, L., Corbella, s., Belles, L. Pacheco, M., Gómez A.M., Herrero, O. Ribas, E. and Pedro, N. (2008). Predictors of therapeutic outcome and process. Psychotherapy Research, 18 (5): 535-542.

Coppock, T.E; Owen, J.J.; Zagarskas, E. & Schmidt, M. (2010). The relationship between therapist and client hope with therapy outcomes. Psychotherapy Research, 20(6): 619-626

Duncan, B.L.; Miller, S.D., B. E. Wampold y M.A. Hubble (Eds.) (2010). The Heat and Soul of Change, Second Edition: Delivering what Works in Therapy. Washington D. C.: APA.

Elliott, R. (2010). Psychotherapy change process research: Realizing the promise. Psychotherapy Research.20 (2) 123-135.

Graf, E., Sator, M. y Spranz-Fogasy, T. (eds.) (2014). Discourse of Helping Professions. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Harper, D. y Thompson, A. R. (Eds.) (2011). Qualitative Research Methods in Mental Health and Psychotherapy: A Guide for Students and Practitioners.New York: Wiley-Blackwell.

Hepburn, A. y Wiggins, S. (2007). Discursive Research in Practice. New Approaches to Psychology and nteraction. Cambridge: Cambridge U. P.

Hill, C, E.: (2001) Helping Skills: The Empirical Foundation. Washington, DC: APA

Hill, C. E. (2012). Consensual qualitative research. A practical resource for investigating social science phenomena. Washington: APA.

Hill, C. E. and Knox, S. (2009). Processing the therapeutic relationship. Psychotherapy  Research, 19(1): 13-29

Kazdin, A. E. (2009). Understanding how and why psychotherapy leads to change.Psychotherapy Research, 19 (4-5): 418-428.

Lazar, Susan G. (2010). Psychotherapy Is Worth It. A Comprehensive Review of Its Cost-Effectiveness. Arlington: American Psychiatric Publising.

LUtz,W. & Knox, S. (2014). Quantitative and Qualitative Methods in Psychotherapy Research. East Susex, Gran Bretaña, Routledge.

Lutz W. & Hill, C. E. (2009). Quantitative and qualitative methods for psychotherapy research: Introduction to special section. Psychotherapy Research, 19(4-5): 369-373.

Niessen-Lie, H.; Monsen, J. T.; Ronnestad, M. H. (2010). Therapist predictors of early patient-rated working alliance: A multilevel approach. Psychotherapy Research, 20(6): 627-646

Norcross, J.C. 2002. Psychotherapy Relationships that work. Therapist Contributions and Responsiveness to Patients. New York: Oxford U.P.

Sauer, E.M.; Anderson, M.Z.; Gormley, B.; Richmond, C. J. & Preacco, L. (2010). Client attachment orientations, working alliances, and responses to therapy: A psychology training clinic study. Psychotherapy Research, 20(6): 702-711

Society for Psuchotherapy Research (2009). Special Issue. Quantitative and Qualitative Methods for Psychotherapy Research. Psychotherapy Research, 19, 369-611.

Tasca, G. A. & Gallop, R. (2009). Multilevel modelling of longitudinal data for psychotherapy researchers I: The basics. Psychotherapy Research, 19 (4-5) 429-437

Tasca, G. A. & Gallop, R. (2009). Multilevel modelling of longitudinal data for psychotherapy researchers II: The complexities. Psychotherapy Research, 19(4-5) 438-452

Timulack, L. (2005, 2008).  Research in psychotherapy and Counselling. London: Sage.
(pg. 105– 153)

Valkonen, J.; Hänninen, V.; Lindfors, O, (2011). Outcomes of psychotherapy from the perspective of the users. Psychotherapy Research, 21(2): 227-240.

Wampold, B. E (2001). The Great Psychotherapy Debate. Models, Methods, and Findings. New York: Routledge.