INVESTIGACIÓN EN COMUNICACIÓN PSICOTERAPÉUTICA COMO VARIABLE PROCESO Y/O RESULTADOS

Cod.22200464

BIBLIOGRAFÍA COMPLEMENTARIA

Alba-Juez, L. (2009). Perspective on Discourse Analysis. Theory and Practice. New Castle upon Tyne: Cambridge Sacholars Publishing:

Barkham, M., Hardy, G. E. y Mellor-Clark, J, (2010).Developing  and Delivering Practice-based Evidence: A Guide for the Psychological Therapies. Chichester: Wiley-Blacwell

Botella, L., Corbella, S., Belles, L. Pacheco, M., Gómez A.M., Herrero, O. Ribas, E. and Pedro, N. (2008). Predictors of therapeutic outcome and process. Psychotherapy Research,18 (5): 535-542

Charadeau, P. y Maingueneau, D. (Eds.) (2005). Diccionario de análisis del discurso. Buenos Aires: Amorrortu.

D'Hondt, S.; Östman, J. y Verschueren (2009). The Pragmatics of Interaction. Amsterdam: Johm Benjamins

Duncan, B.L.; Miller, S.D., B. E. Wampold y M.A. Hubble (Eds.) (2009). The Heat and Soul of Change, Second Edition: Delivering what Works in Therapy. Washington D. C.: American Psychological Association.

Graf, E., Sator, M. and Spranz-Fogazy, T. (Eds.) (2014). Discourse of Helping Professions. Amsterdam: Johm Benjamins.

Gee, J. P. (2014). An introduction to Discourse Analysis. Theory and Method. London: Routledge (4ª edición)

Harper, D. y Thompson, A. R. (Eds.) (2012). Qualitative Research Methods in Mental Health and Psychotherapy: A Guide for Students and Practitioners. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.

Hepburn, A. y Wiggins, S. (2007). Discursive Research in Practice. New Approaches to Psychology and Interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge U. P.

Hill, C, E..: (2001) Helping Skills: The Empirical Foundation. Washington, DC: APA

Hill, C. E. (2012). Consensual qualitative research. A practical resource for investigating social science phenomena. Washington: APA.

Hill, C. E. & Knox, S. (2009). Processing the therapeutic relationship. Psychotherapy  Research,19(1): 13-29

Johnstone, B. (2008). Dyscourse Analysis (2º Edition). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.

Liebherz, S.; Schmidt, N. & Rabung, S. (2016) How to assess the quality of psychotherapy outcome studies: A systematic review of quality assessment criteria, Psychotherapy Research, 26:5, 573-589, DOI: 10.1080/10503307.2015.1044763

Levitt, H. M. & Piazza-Bonin, E. (2017). The professionalization and training of psychologists: The place of clinical wisdom, Psychotherapy Research, 27:2, 127-142, DOI: 10.1080/10503307.2015.1090034

Lutz, W. & Knox, S. (2014). Quantitative and Qualitative Methos in Psychotherapy Research. East Sussex, UK: Routlege.

Norcross, J.C. (2002). Psychotherapy Relationships that work. Therapist Contributions and Responsiveness to Patients. New York: Oxford U.P. (Capítulos 1, 2 y 24).

Peräkylä, A.; Antaki, C.; Vehviläinen,S., Leudar, I. (Eds.) (2008). Conversation Analysis and Psychotherapy. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.

Romano, M. & Peters, L. (2016). Understanding the process of motivational interviewing. A review of the relational and technical hypotesis. Psychotherapy Research, Vol 26 (2), 220-240.

Salvatore, S.; Gelo, O.; Metrangolo, A.; Terrone, G.; Pace, V.; Venuleo, C.; Venezia, A. & Ciavolino, E. (2017). An automated method of content analysis for psychotherapy research: A further validation, Psychotherapy Research, 27:1, 38-50, DOI: 10.1080/10503307.2015.1072282

Tasca, G. A. & Gallop, R. (2009). Multilevel modelling of longitudinal data for psychotherapy researchers I: The basics. Psychotherapy Research, 19 (4-5): 429-437

Timulack, L. (2005, 2008).  Research in psychotherapy and Counselling. London: Sage. (pg. 105– 153)